We support Microsoft .NET Framework 2.0 & 1.1, all versions of Access, SQL 2000, SQL 7.0, SQL 2005 Express, SOAP, FrontPage 2002, 2003, Visual Studio 2005, Index Server, XML, UDDI, & Mobile device support. We also offer great third party tools like SmarterMail, Merak Mail, SmarterStats, PHP, Perl, MySql, DeepMetrix Livestats XSP 8.0.   We support Microsoft .NET Framework 2.0 & 1.1, all versions of Access, SQL 2000, SQL 7.0, SQL 2005 Express, SOAP, FrontPage 2002, 2003, Visual Studio 2005, Index Server, XML, UDDI, & Mobile device support. We also offer great third party tools like SmarterMail, Merak Mail, SmarterStats, PHP, Perl, MySql, DeepMetrix Livestats XSP 8.0.
 Saturday, October 08, 2005

Network operator Cogent said Friday that rival Level 3 "has taken the necessary actions" to once again carry its customers' Internet traffic, a sign that days old service disruptions for a significant number of Internet users are over, for now.

It has been reported, Level 3 Communications, has since Wednesday refused to make room for traffic from rival Cogent because of an ongoing dispute about financial arrangements. The nasty turn has disrupted Internet service for a significant number of cogent customers since about Wednesday.

On Friday afternoon, Cogent said Level 3 has restored all peering connections. Level 3, in a statement, said it's done so in order to let Cogent customers make alternative arrangements. "We will maintain this connection until 6:00 a.m. ET, November 9, 2005," Level 3 wrote in a statement.

The apparent turn for the better in the spat follows an outcry for the U.S. government to regulate traffic-swapping arrangements between major communications providers.

These agreements, as the experiences of the last few days shows, are so key that they can bring Internet traffic to a halt for significant amounts of people. Critics contend that more of these spats between operators will erupt, cutting off even more people.

Such spats also highlight arguments from a number of European governments that are calling for the United States to relinquish its unilateral control over Internet governance, in favor of a new body. The United States opposes the changes.