We typically refuse to get political on this blog; Since many of the out right lies have become the standard let's just look at the current crisis, and you determine who is lieing. The fact is that both Democrats and Republicans are responsible. They are responsible because everyone of them is guilty of taking this money but there is no doubt at all that the Democrats took much more money and their envolvment goes to the core.

Yet in the campaign the democrats are now claiming to be completely innocent! One should question having any of these people representing we the people of America. We can say we do not want more taxes like it or not we will get them. We can say that we do not want our country to become socialist! 

Chrisopher Dodd should never open his mouth and point fingers. One should ask how on earth he even retains his position?

While we are on that topic Before becoming Treasury Secretary, Henry M.Paulson was Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Goldman Sachs since the firm’s initial public offering in 1999. He joined Goldman Sachs. Since it has now been exposed that Goldman Sachs has a 20 billion dollar exposure! Should one should give this man a check for 700 billion to manage!

Please how about getting fired, or resign and at very least turn his duties over to the assitant. To listen to this drivel about what they did not know, and when they did know it is nothinig more than lies. 

Face it all of congress and senate should be fired! None of these people have the American people's interest at heart. I keep waiting for someone to show the American people some level of justice.

Worldnetdaily:

On Oct. 1, ComCast cable company will update its user agreement to say that users will be allowed 250 gigabytes of traffic per month, the company announced on its Web site.

Comcast floated the idea of a 250 gigabyte cap in May and mentioned then that it might charge users $15 for every 10 gigabytes they go over, but the overage fee was missing in Thursday's announcement.

Curbing the top users is necessary to keep the network fast and responsive for other users, Comcast has said.

Comcast stressed that the bandwidth cap is far above the median monthly usage of its customers, which 2 to 3 gigabytes.

Very few subscribers use more than 250 gigabytes, it said. A user could download 125 standard-definition movies, about four per day, before hitting the limit.

The cap is also above those of some other ISPs. Cox Communications' monthly caps vary from 5 gigabytes to 75 gigabytes depending the subscriber's plan. Time Warner Cable Inc. is testing caps between 5 gigabytes and 40 gigabytes in one market. Frontier Communications Co., a phone company, plans to start charging extra for use of more than 5 gigabytes per month.

Yahoo! says it won't target you… to your face. On Aug. 8, the Internet giant announced that it will allow users to opt out of behavioral targeting on its site. But in fact, that change only affects behaviorally targeted ads that users see. The company will still collect information on the Web sites visited by unique computers, it just won't serve ads to individual users based on the info.

"This isn't rejecting cookies outright, you are just preferring not to see the ads," says Anne Toth, Yahoo's head of privacy and vice-president of policy.

So Yahoo (YHOO) will still know that you looked up Fannie Mae's stock on Yahoo Finance and then checked out foreclosed homes on Yahoo's real estate site. It just won't serve you a mortgage ad based on that info when you're checking e-mail. It will also still serve ads to you based on your location and the content of the page that you are on.

Toth says Yahoo must keep the information to report accurate financials on advertising click-through rates and visitors. It probably also wants to tell advertisers about the kind of people who visit certain pages, in aggregate, to sell more expensive advertising. Behavioral targeting can more than triple the price of some ads.

Congressional Pressure
The move came in response to congressional action. On Aug. 1, the House Energy & Commerce Committee sent a letter to 33 companies, including AT&T (ATT), Comcast (CMCSA), Google (GOOG), Microsoft (MSFT), and Yahoo, opening an inquiry into their practices for collecting and using data to target ads to consumers based on what they do online.

Behavioral targeting is different from other kinds of targeting, such as search targeting or geotargeting, which uses IP addresses or Zip Codes that people provide when they sign up for a site. Behavioral targeting works by tracking surfers as they move around the Web. Companies then apply sophisticated algorithms to that past behavior to decide what kinds of ads to show the people they're tracking.

Investors holding nearly 76 percent of Yahoo's 1.38 billion shares gave solid votes in favor of all nine current directors, in what represents an endorsement of their tough stance with Microsoft Corp in talks on a merger or partial sale.

Executives and board members tried to soothe dissenting investors, insisting Yahoo had been serious in the Microsoft talks and that it had good prospects in the next three years.

Seeking to counter attempts by some to blame Yang for talks collapsing, Chairman Roy Bostock said Yahoo's board "called the shots" when discussing Microsoft's proposals, including a $47.5 billion bid and attempts to buy Yahoo's Web search business.

Bostock said he could not understand why the software maker withdrew its bid. "There was never a compelling offer put on the table," he said. A Microsoft spokesman disputed Bostock's version of events, saying "Yahoo is attempting to rewrite history yet again."

Yahoo shares slipped 9 cents on Friday to $19.80, not far above the $19.18 that they fetched the day before Microsoft made its interest public on February 1. Microsoft's last offer for the company would have valued Yahoo at $33 per share.

A majority of members of the Federal Communications Commission have cast votes in favor of punishing Comcast Corp. for blocking subscribers' Internet traffic, an agency official said Friday. Comcast, the nation's largest cable company, was accused of violating agency principles that guarantee customers open access to the Internet.

Three commissioners have voted in favor of an order reaching agreement with the finding, enough for a majority on the five-member commission. But the decision will not be final until all five members have cast their votes. The commission is scheduled to take up the issue at its Aug. 1 meeting.

The potentially precedent-setting move stems from a complaint against Comcast that the company had blocked Internet traffic among users of a certain type of "file sharing" software that allows them to exchange large amounts of data.

The text of the order is not public. But Martin has said it will not include a fine. He also said it will require Comcast to stop its practice of blocking; provide details to the commission on the extent and manner in which the practice has been used; and to disclose to consumers details on future plans for managing its network going forward.

"I continue to believe that is imperative that all consumers have unfettered access to the Internet," Martin said in a statement released early Saturday morning. "I am pleased that a majority has agreed that the Commission both has the authority to and in fact will stop broadband service providers when they block or interfere with subscribers' access."

The FCC approved a policy statement in September 2005 that outlined a set of principles meant to ensure that broadband networks are "widely deployed, open, affordable and accessible to all consumers."

The principles, however, are "subject to reasonable network management."

Comcast spokeswoman Sena Fitzmaurice in a statement released Friday night said the company's network management practices are "reasonable, wholly consistent with industry practices and that we did not block access to Web sites or online applications, including peer-to-peer services."

The action is the first test of the agency's network neutrality principles. Members of both the House and Senate have sponsored network neutrality bills, but they have never come close to becoming law.  Full Article

Yang advised Yahoo's employees to brace for even more turbulence during the next few weeks, predicting that Microsoft may make more buyout proposals as Icahn ridicules the board.

I know Yang is alot smarter than me but really it seems like he missed some serious economic class somewhere. How low does the share of stock have to go before the current board gets the point. MS plays hardball there is no doubt about this. But really let's say that MS no longer has any interest in Yahoo. What is the plan then Yang? What does the stock shares have to drop to and then what is the real plan?

MS has already said that the last offer of $33.00 with the current share price of $21.19 even the $30.00 per share offer is more than fair. Yet this was called Microsoft's "ludicrous" offer in its own shareholder letter, which underscored the Silicon Valley company's determination to fend off Icahn's attempted coup.

If the shareholds are really what Yang has said was his interest anyone who can add or subtract should question this claim. Personally anyone who has had to deal with Yahoo mail can tell that the company is on the ropes. You cannot lay off this many people and think the company can continue to grow. I have personally had people ask; How could Yahoo go broke? I can only assume they have never watched a take over happen.

I won't even go into the clear Anti Trust issues associated to Yahoo and Google working together as a solution to the problem.

This is the most current Yahoo article though the positions are weak. Icahn likely will get the board replaced and we will all wait until the August 1 shareholders vote.

Security appliance vendor Barracuda Networks is looking to buy Sourcefire, makers of the open-source Snort and ClamAV security software.
 
Barracuda said late Thursday that it had made a US$186 million cash offer to Sourcefire's board of directors Tuesday. Barracuda is willing to pay $7.50 per share, a 13 percent premium on the company's current stock price, but about half what shares Sourcefire fetched a year ago.

"Barracuda Networks is uniquely positioned to address the challenges that have impacted the company's performance and stock price," Barracuda said in a statement.

Although Sourcefire is best known for its intrusion detection software, the company bought the ClamAV open source antivirus project last August, and is now working on ways to commercialize this code.That's an area where Barracuda believes it can help out. ClamAV is included in Barracuda's appliance products.

The open-source software has been at the source of a high-profile legal dispute between Barracuda and competitor Trend Micro, which claims that ClamAV violates one of its patents.

Because it is already fighting a lawsuit with Trend Micro, Barracuda feels it is already addressing what could turn into a legal problem for Sourcefire, Barracuda President and CEO Dean Drako said in a Tuesday letter to Sourcefire's board of directors, which Barracuda made public Thursday.

"We also feel that the company's inaction in dealing with the looming threat of litigation from Trend Micro has had an effect on the stock price," he wrote.

Sourcefire representatives could not be reached immediately for comment, but the fact that Barracuda felt compelled to take its offer public suggests that it was not well-received by Sourcefire's board of directors.

In a letter sent Friday to the judge overseeing the case in Delaware, a lawyer for the shareholders argued Yahoo is trying "to whitewash embarrassing documents" because the company thinks the information will damage the board's efforts to repel a challenge by activist investor Carl Icahn.

Angered by the board's handling of Microsoft bid, Icahn has nominated an alternate slate of candidates to oppose Yahoo's 10 current directors — including Chief Executive Jerry Yang — at the Sunnyvale-based company's July 3 annual meeting.

Yahoo is trying "to sanitize the public record and maintain a cloak of secrecy regarding unflattering evidence of breach of fiduciary duty," shareholder attorney Joel Friedlander wrote in a letter to Chancellor William B. Chandler III.

The redacted documents include information about an employee severance plan that Yahoo adopted shortly after Microsoft made its initial bid Jan. 31 and notes about a conversation between Yang and Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer, Friedlander wrote.

Yahoo had no immediate comment Friday. Generally, companies often seek to keep parts of publicly available lawsuits under seal for competitive reasons.Yahoo had previously disclosed the plans would give its 13,800 employees anywhere from four month to two years pay. Every $1.4 billion in severance cost theoretically would translate into about $1 per share less that Microsoft would have available to offer Yahoo shareholders.

Ballmer orally offered $33 per share, or $47.5 billion, but then withdrew the bid when Yang held out for $37 per share. Legg Mason money manager Bill Miller, whose fund is Yahoo's second largest shareholder, has publicly said he would have happily supported a Microsoft offer of $34 per share.

Friedlander's letter also indicated the redacted documents include comments that Yahoo's top executives made about the severance plans.

Charter has told its high-speed Internet customers in four markets about the pilot, which will produce enough information for Web advertisers to target online advertising for individual customers based on their habits.

The ads "will better reflect the interests you express through your Web-surfing activity," Charter senior vice president Joe Stackhouse told the affected subscribers in a letter. "You will not see more ads — just ads that are more relevant to you."

In response to the announcement, Rep. Edward Markey (D-Mass.) and Rep. Joe Barton (R-Texas) asked Charter President and Chief Executive Neil Smit to put the plan on hold until the three can confer.

The tracking is set to begin in June in Ft. Worth, Texas; San Luis Obispo, Calif.; Oxford, Mass.; and Newtown, Conn.

Subscribers can opt out of the tracking, though they must provide their name and address to install an opt-out cookie on their computer.

Should Charter instead offer subscribers the ability to opt in if they want to participate?

The bugs in question are crazy raspberry ants, which are named not for their flavor, but for their inscrutable meanderings and for past efforts by exterminator Tom Raspberry to eliminate them.

Supposedly, crazy raspberry ants are fond of electronics.

According to Associated Press writer Linda Stewart Ball, the ants are "are invading homes and yards across the Houston area, shorting out electrical boxes and messing up computers."

"They have been known to short out many different types of electrical apparatuses," says a Texas A&M University Web page about the pests.

Exterminators in Houston are aware of problem but aren't all that alarmed.

How it works: The USPTO (US Patent & Trademark Office) gets the initial patent application from the inventor or patent agent. But it can take a while to grant or deny a patent application. They have a heavy workload, examining and publishing thousands of patents each week! However, during the period of waiting for a USPTO grant decision, the USPTO publishes the patent application at some point (usually after 18 months) and the general public may view the full contents and it is in the public domain. (note: FreshPatents.com does not have access to and does not publish confidential and/or non-USPTO-published Patent Applications!)

Next, FreshPatents.com (no affiliation with the USPTO) empowers users with FREE tools to better find and track published patent applications. FreshPatents.com features the latest published US patent applications...which is certainly useful for your business and technology intelligence needs.

In case you're having a hard time keeping track, here's a brief history of events as they've unfurled in the ongoing Microsoft-Yahoo drama:

May 2006: Some of the earliest rumors that Microsoft is considering an offer to buy Yahoo appear in the New York Post and The Wall Street Journal; at the time such a deal is considered far-fetched, so the rumors are dismissed fairly quickly.

October 2006: Rumors begin to swirl that Yahoo has approached Time Warner about purchasing AOL, a notion that is somewhat more believable than a Microsoft-Yahoo deal.

2007: Microsoft-Yahoo rumors surface from time to time but disappear soon after as there is nothing to substantiate them.

Feb. 1, 2008: In the shot heard 'round the Internet, Microsoft makes a formal purchase offer of $44.6 billion based on Yahoo's stock price of $19.18; Yahoo's stock price starts rising.

Feb. 11: Yahoo rejects Microsoft's offer as too low; Yahoo stock price closes at $29.87. According to the rumor mill, Yahoo is now looking for closer to $40 a share because the value of the company has risen since the offer.

Feb. 12: Microsoft for the first time publicly hints in a letter to Yahoo that it is willing to get hostile in its takeover, saying it "reserves the right to pursue all necessary steps to ensure that Yahoo's shareholders are provided with the opportunity to realize the value inherent in our proposal."

March 5: Reports emerge that Yahoo is stepping up negotiations with Time Warner for some kind of tie-up with AOL. Meanwhile, reports make the rounds that Microsoft will mount a proxy fight if Yahoo won't play ball.

March 11: News Corp.'s Murdoch says publicly that he won't "get into a fight" with Microsoft over Yahoo, because the software giant has "a lot more money" than his company.

April 5: Microsoft sends Yahoo a join-us-or-die letter, claiming that if the two companies can't make a deal in three weeks, Microsoft will take its offer directly to shareholders in a proxy battle. In the letter, signed by Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer, Microsoft basically tells Yahoo board members they've run out of better options, and it would be foolish not to accept an offer immediately. Microsoft also hints that it would consider Yahoo less valuable if it is forced to mount a proxy fight, thus threatening to lower its offer.

April 7: Yahoo again rejects Microsoft's offer on the basis that it is too low. In a letter signed by Chairman Roy Bostock and CEO Jerry Yang, the company calls Microsoft's threat of a proxy battle "unproductive," and says it would consider a deal if Microsoft was willing to pony up more dough.

April 9: Yahoo says it is testing the display of Google search ads in a small number of its search-engine queries, a move seen as a way to stave off Microsoft's advances. Microsoft immediately attacks that notion as anticompetitive and says it would never pass regulatory approval.

April 10: News Corp. is said to be in talks with Microsoft to join forces to buy Yahoo, seen by many as a way that Microsoft can raise its offer without spending any more money. At the same time, the old Yahoo-AOL union talk again makes the rounds.

Warner Music Group is reportedly considering a plan to have Internet service providers add $5 a month to subscribers' bills for unlimited access to music on the Web. Full Article here.

Now here is a cure to the problem. Have everyone pay, and a totally strapped ISP industry collect and pay for something the media industry cannot control on their own. Lets see with the names like TimeWarner Cable, Comcast, Roadrunner, Cox and Charter holding the lions share of cable networks.

In america the adsl based ISP find it nearly impossible to compete with cable. This due to the amount of bandwidth cable companies provide, this is primarily due to the fact that ADSL simply will not support this type of bandwidth. Now it seems they really want to collect a tax from each of their clients to pay for those who listen to music on the web.

The handful of small ISP's left would simply be driven again by telling the small number of users left they will have to tax them $5.00 so the Music Industry gets their part of the pie. Of course this means nothing to the Cable Companies who already dominate the industry. Seems to me they already make enough money off their user base, without taxing their client base to some 20 billion dollars more.

I currently pay $180 per month for cable TV and internet. If this is typical and 5.00 relates to 20 billion. It does not take a math major to see how big this pie really is.

Does anyone even remember cable TV that was not loaded with commericals? When it is the only game in town, I am sorry but this is nothing more than a monopoly. One which is now seeking to add another $5.00 to the bill.

Are Apple sales in trouble? Two research analysts have reported in recent days that Apple is aggressively cutting back production on iPods and iPhones, while increasing production on Mac computers.

It seems that the iPod Touch may have seen the weakest sales. Berger reported production orders for the Touch have fallen the most. The device may suffer from being less than an iPhone, since it has no phone capabilities but is substantially more expensive than Apple's music-playing iPhones. The touch relies on Wi-Fi for connectivity, so users who aren't in range of a Wi-Fi connection simply can't get online.

Meanwhile, Asian production facilities indicate that production is going up for Macs, down for iPods, and the iPhone situation is volatile.

For MacBooks and iMacs, production has moved up more than 20 percent so far this quarter, Banc of America said, which indicates Apple is replenishing inventory and seeing solid demand. Banc of America predicts continued growth through March.

After severe production cuts in December and early January, production is now up for iPhones. Banc of America expressed concern that production and demand for the innovative phone remain lackluster.

Meanwhile, Net Applications released new numbers on its operating-system statistics, which revealed that Macs accounted for the largest percentage of Internet traffic ever -- 7.57 percent. iPhone-based traffic nudged up from 0.12 percent in December to 0.13 percent in January. More importantly, Net Applications' numbers show that iPhone traffic is coming from many more countries than have official wireless carriers for the phones, indicating substantial gray-market sales.

"We've heard the rumours that many iPhones are being used outside the officially sanctioned countries. So we decided to check it out and surprise, surprise, it's true. The iPhone has a presence in almost every country on Earth," Net Applications wrote in its report.

A third underwater fiber-optic cable was cut today in the Persian Gulf, off the coast of Dubai, United Arab Emirates, according to its owner Flag Telecom, compounding Internet problems in the Middle East and India, the BBC reported today.

The third cable, known as the Falcon cable, comes after breaks in two cables off the Mediterranean seacoast on Wednesday.

Those breaks required carriers to reroute Internet traffic from the U.S. to India and other nations in the Middle East the other way around the world, across the Pacific Ocean, leading to some Internet delays.

The cause of the first two breaks is believed to be a result of a ship's anchor that dragged and snapped the cables, and a similar cause might be involved in the third incident. Flag Telecom will start repairs next week on one of the first two cables linking Egypt and Italy, the company said today. A repair ship is expected to reach the site of the damage, 8.3 kilometers (about five miles) from Alexandria, Egypt, on Tuesday. The repair will take a week to complete.

The breaks on Wednesday were to the Flag Telecom Europe-Asia cable, owned by India's Reliance Communications Ltd., and on the South East Asia-Middle East-West Europe 4 (SEA-ME-WE 4) cable, owned by a consortium that includes Verizon Communications Inc. in New York. The cable damage disrupted the Internet and other communications to the Middle East and India.

Flag said the Europe-Asia cable was cut at 8 a.m. GMT on Wednesday. The company also said it was able to restore circuits to some customers and was switching to alternative routes for others.

The US Congress Judiciary Committee will hold a hearing next week to scrutinize Microsoft's multi-billion-dollar bid to acquire Yahoo in order to take on Internet goliath Google. Leading members of the committee scheduled a February 8 hearing after Microsoft's announced it is courting California-based Yahoo with a 44.6-billion-dollar offer.

"Microsoft's bid to acquire Yahoo is certainly one of the largest technology mergers we've seen and presents important issues regarding the competitive landscape of the Internet," Congressmen John Conyers and Lamar Smith said in a written statement.

"The Committee will hear from experts who will weigh in on whether this proposed consolidation works to further or undermine the fundamental principles of a competitive Internet." Yahoo has yet to say whether it will accept the offer, but analysts believe it is too good a deal for the struggling Internet veteran to refuse and that US regulators are unlikely to find grounds to stop it.

On Friday, I had a brief phone interview with Kevin Johnson, president of the Microsoft division that includes Windows and Windows Live, shortly after the software giant announced its $44.6 billion bid for Yahoo. I tried to get more details on the how Microsoft plans to bridge the cultural gap between the two companies, which brands it is tied to and what it will do if Yahoo says no. Sorry, I don't have more concrete answers, but I've posted a pretty complete transcript so you can read for yourself. More

Internet access in India improved Friday as international service providers shifted their Internet traffic to cables under the Pacific Ocean to bypass two undersea cables damaged earlier this week.

The two cables deep under the Mediterranean Sea snapped on Wednesday 1.30.2008, disrupting service since then across a swath of Asia and the Middle East.

India took one of the biggest hits, and the damage from its slowdowns and outages rippled to some U.S. and European companies that rely on its lucrative outsourcing industry to handle customer service calls and other operations.

Bandwidth providers in India said they were working to restore service to about 80 percent of its usual speed Friday.

In Egypt, Internet access remained sporadic or nonexistent Friday, the first day of the official Muslim weekend in the Middle East when all government offices and most businesses are closed. Egyptian Minister of Communications and Information Technology Tarek Kamil said service would be up to about 80 percent of its usual capacity within 48 hours.

The pair of cables — which lie on the sea floor near each other and at some points are no thicker than the average human thumb — caused problems across an area thousands of miles wide. India, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Egypt, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Kuwait and Bahrain all reported trouble.

By an overwhelming margin -- 409 to 2 -- the U.S. House of Representatives passed new legislation on Thursday aimed at making the Internet safer for children. The Securing Adolescents From Exploitation-Online (SAFE) Act was sponsored by Texas Democrat Nick Lampson, one of the founding members of the House Missing and Exploited Children's Caucus.

Among other things, the legislation imposes significant fines on Internet service providers (ISPs) that fail to report evidence of child exploitation to the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children. According to a press release from Rep. Lampson's office, ISPs would be fined $150,000 per incident per day for first offenses, and $300,000 per incident per day for second and succeeding offenses.

"We are not trying to make these (Internet providers) spies on what they put out there," Lampson said in the statement, "but there are plenty of ways information can be gleaned from what you see on the Internet and if that is illegal, we want it reported to law enforcement."

The requirements of the legislation, if it takes effect, could impose significant regulatory burdens on affected sites. In addition to reporting possible violations to NCMEC, ISPs and covered sites would be required to preserve the images themselves (normally itself a violation of federal law), as well as preserving information about when the images were accessed and any available information about the individual who downloaded them.

As it is currently drafted, the legislation applies not merely to photographs of minors engaged in sexual activity (which is clearly child pornography), but also more subjective material, including photographs of minors in provocative poses and sexually explicit cartoon drawings depicting minors. Many question whether ISPs should be put in the uncomfortable position of determining whether borderline material should be reported, much of which may not even be criminal.

Comcast Corp. acknowledged "delaying" some subscriber Internet traffic, but said any roadblocks it puts up are temporary and intended to improve surfing for other users.

The statement was a response to an Associated Press report last week that detailed how the nation's largest cable company was interfering with file sharing by some of its Internet subscribers. The AP also found that Comcast's computers masqueraded as those of its users to interrupt file-sharing connections.

Internet watchdog groups denounced Comcast's actions, calling it an example of the kind of abuse that could be curbed with so-called "Net Neutrality" legislation. It would require Internet providers to treat all traffic equally — as has largely been the case historically.

Comcast has repeatedly denied blocking any Internet application, including "peer-to-peer" file-sharing programs like BitTorrent, which the AP used in its nationwide tests.

On Tuesday, Mitch Bowling, senior vice president of Comcast Online Services, added a nuance to that statement, saying that while Comcast may block initial connection attempts between two computers, it eventually lets the traffic through if the computers keep trying.

When eBay (EBAY) bought Skype Technologies for $2.6 billion in late 2005, few could fathom why the online auction company saw so much in a money-losing Internet phone service. Two years later, eBay is admitting it made a mistake.

On Oct. 1, eBay confirmed that it overpaid for Skype—by nearly $1 billion—and that the popular Web-calling business has not performed up to the rosy forecasts set back in 2005. In announcing a $1.43 billion charge against profits, eBay also revealed a broad management reshuffle in which Skype co-founders Niklas Zennström and Janus Friis will be leaving their posts.

About a half-billion dollars of the charge is for a payment to Zennström, Friis, and other early Skype investors. Although it might sound like a plump farewell present, that payout is well short of the $1.7 billion those shareholders stood to receive from eBay if Skype had met the targets for users, revenue, and profits set in the 2005 buyout agreement.

Considering Skype's rapid growth since the acquisition, it can't be an encouraging sign that its founders and early investors are cashing out well before the clock has run out on the original performance goals. When eBay bought Skype, it agreed to pay Skype shareholders as much as $1.7 billion extra if Skype met certain user growth and financial targets in 2008 and 2009. In accepting $530 million, those investors agreed to forgo any future payments, suggesting that none were likely. eBay plans to record that payment, plus $900 million more, as an impairment charge recorded in the third quarter.

The geographical regions are as follows:

REGION 1 -- USA, Canada
REGION 2 -- Japan, Europe, South Africa, Middle East, Greenland
REGION 3 -- S.Korea, Taiwan, Hong Kong, Parts of South East Asia
REGION 4 -- Australia, New Zealand, Latin America (including Mexico)
REGION 5 -- Eastern Europe, Russia, India, Africa
REGION 6 -- China
REGION 7 -- Reserved for Unspecified Special Use
REGION 8 -- Persevered for Cruise Ships, Airlines, etc...
REGION 0 or REGION ALL -- Discs are uncoded and can be played Worldwide, however, PAL discs must be played in a PAL-compatible unit and NTSC discs must be played in an NTSC-compatible unit.

DVDs encoded for regions other than Region 1 cannot be played on a region 1 DVD player, also, players marketed for other regions cannot play region 1-stamped DVDs

Growing up in rural Lacrosse, Wash., Robert Moore reached adolescence and discovered he was a high school misfit. Suffering from several ailments, including narcolepsy, Moore skipped playing sports, the normal path to small-town popularity.

He moved to Spokane, graduated from North Central High School and became skilled enough to land several jobs, including a project for one firm needing anti-spam software.

In 2005, a Florida man, Edwin Pena, found Moore's site and asked him to create a tool for detecting certain types of network computers that worked with a new technology, Voice over Internet Protocol, or VoIP.

About a year later, FBI agents showed up at Moore's north Spokane home and arrested him, charging him with federal wire fraud and computer hacking. They also arrested Pena in Miami. Pena, 25, jumped bail and fled the country and is believed to be living in South America.

Moore, now 23, was nabbed because he designed the software tools Pena used to bilk Internet phone companies of more than $1 million in unpaid VoIP phone charges.

Next month, Moore will begin serving two years in a federal prison at a site not yet revealed. The New Jersey federal judge who sentenced him also ordered Moore to pay $152,000 in restitution to victims of the scheme.

The case created international attention. It marked the first large-scale hacking of the VoIP system. Moore used his 12 home computers to find vulnerable network doorways, called ports.

He pleaded guilty to the charges, acknowledging his role but saying he was just a provider of information that Pena misused for personal gain.

"What I did was totally wrong, and I have to pay for it," Moore said. "But Edwin was the guy who stole the minutes and resold them. All I did was find passwords for (network computers) that he wanted to use."

Many who wrote about or discussed the VoIP break-in said Moore's use of fairly unsophisticated tools, coupled with some special software he designed, pointed out major security holes in many corporate networks.

Enable the Display of File Extensions in Vista:

1. Open a folder or open explorer
2. Click the Layout button (to the left of the Views button) as shown in the picture below.

3. Click Folder Options
4. Click the View tab
5. Uncheck Hide extensions for known file types
6. Click OK

Dateline NBC associate producer Michelle Madigan was heckled and derided as she ran from DefCon, the world's largest computer hackers conference, and raced away in a car.

"They sent a moderately attractive young lady with a purse cam whose mission was to first capture someone on film admitting to a felony, which is really not cool, and second to catch a fed on film," said DefCon spokesman "Priest."

"She was basically trying to do a slam piece."

Federal agents openly, and covertly, mingle with hackers at the conference, which features a panel discussion titled "Meet the Fed."

"This is the Switzerland of hacking, neutral ground on which hackers and feds meet with a common goal of making computers safer," said Priest.

Dateline did not respond to AFP requests for comment but issued a general statement saying it does not discuss reporting tactics.

Priest and DefCon founder Jeff Moss, whose hacker name is Dark Tangent, lured Madigan to a packed conference room by putting out word they were going to have hackers finger federal agents in a game called "spot the fed."

After she was in the audience, it was announced the game was actually "spot the undercover reporter."

Without naming Madigan, Moss condemned her stealth tactics from a stage. Boos and jeers erupted from hundreds of hackers, one calling for her to be tarred and feathered.

Madigan shoved aside a DefCon "goon," one of the volunteers working at the event, and dashed from the room as the mob called for her to be booted from the premises.

Root Servers.

The root name server operators do not determine the content of the root zone file. The file is edited by the IANA according to a process described on the IANA web site. The root name server operators publish the file as received from the IANA. See: http://www.iana.org/root-management.htm

No Internet traffic passes through the root name servers at all. They have nothing to do with routing, note the difference in spelling. Name servers just answer queries from other parts of the DNS.

The root name servers do not store all the information in the DNS. Storing all the information in one place would be totally infeasible today. This is exactly why the DNS was developed as a distributed database. So if you register thatnewdomain.org the root zone file will not change and the root name servers will not give different answers. The ORG zone file will be changed.

The root name servers are not queried every time you browse the web or send mail. Information is cached in the DNS. Your computer will query a caching DNS server to resolve domain names. A well behaved DNS server needs to query the root name servers only once every 48 hours for each particular TLD.

In the meantime it can resolve names for that TLD without involvement of the root name servers. Because of this caching almost all DNS queries are answered without involvement of the root name servers.

The Public-Root Servers are strategically deployed around the globe. They support a global network of domain name servers that provide access to all known, non-colliding, and operational Top-Level Domains Some of their locations

In 2005 the current 12 organisations providing root name service at 13 unique IPv4 addresses. They were:

A - VeriSign Global Registry Services
B - University of Southern California - Information Sciences Institute
C - Cogent Communications
D - University of Maryland
E - NASA Ames Research Center
F - Internet Systems Consortium, Inc.
G - U.S. DOD Network Information Center
H - U.S. Army Research Lab
I - Autonomica/NORDUnet
J - VeriSign Global Registry Services
K - RIPE NCC
L - ICANN
M - WIDE Project

Last year, AOL said it was giving away its e-mail accounts, software and other features to users as it moved to an advertising-focused business model.

Overall revenue at AOL was $1.3 billion in the second quarter of 2007, which ended June 30, down 38% from the same quarter in 2006. Advertising revenue increased 16% to $522 million, up from the $449 million in the same quarter of 2006, but down from the 40% increases the company had reported in the last four quarters, according to the statement. AOL's operating income climbed 9% to $360 million. At the end of June, AOL had 10.9 million U.S. subscribers, a 59% drop from the 26.7 million subscribers it had in September 2002.

In the company's earnings call, Time Warner Chairman and CEO Richard Parsons said the parent company no longer thinks that AOL's advertising business will grow "at or above" the rate of growth of other U.S. Internet companies. AOL is in trouble," said Rob Enderle, an analyst at San Jose-based Enderle Group. "The market they exist in is fairly robust, and they shouldn't be showing the significant declines that they're showing."

However, Enderle said changing AOL's model was probably the right thing to do because if it hadn't, the company would have been out of business by now.

ComputerWorld's On the Mark: Shift to Web Has Just Begun:

At the bottom of the article is this sub article which seems to have been clipped on as some type of public service announcement. While the concerns about infrastructure are true the questions are more related to Ubuntu.

Ubuntu Live: Dog Pile on Microsoft

While certainly I am not a Linux hater; I honestly question people who think that an operating system can or should be compared to a religon. I have seen these zeolut comments all over the web for years now and it really does little to improve either the OS or its adoption.

Honestly if you talk bad about someone you achieve nothing. If you find a weakness in the MS OS, just make something better and that is all you have to do. It has nothing to do with Catholiclism verses Protestants. If you beat them at their own game that is all that is required. Saying that we have plans for server improvements in the coming year, then going off into that old time religon does nothing.

I suggest that time is better spent finding those areas where you can beat a company at their own game, and just do it. The rest means nothing and is truly a waste of time. Why would you build server OS strickly on the hate for something else. If you have a better mouse trap just build it. Seems that focusing on making Linux drop dead simple, more secure, more rapidly updated, would be more than enough to beat the hated Microsoft and their evil empire. But really likened to the Protestant Reformation?

The acquisition of the security software outfit bolsters a product suite designed to loosen Microsoft's hold on business customers.

Google has long coveted the pot of gold represented by Microsoft's business customers, those lucrative users of such applications as Outlook e-mail, Excel spreadsheets, and PowerPoint slide presentations.

In recent years, Google has been snapping up companies in hopes of replicating that suite of services, and it finally may be nearing a full quiver.

On July 9, Google said it is paying $625 million for security company Postini, which helps corporations and smaller businesses monitor e-mails and instant messages, encrypt information, and enforce company policies in such areas as the dissemination of confidential information. Google's third-largest purchase after YouTube and DoubleClick, Postini is the market leader in its field, with more than 36,000 companies using its products.

"With this transaction, we're reinforcing our commitment to delivering compelling hosted applications to businesses of all sizes. With the addition of Postini, our apps are not just simple and appealing to users -- they can also streamline the complex information security mandates within these organizations," said Eric Schmidt, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Google.

Hosted services, like Google Apps and Postini solutions, provide organizations with high quality communications tools without the expense and hassle of traditional on-premise solutions. Google Apps, which includes Gmail, Calendar, Talk, Docs & Spreadsheets, and Personal Start Page, has been adopted by more than 100,000 businesses already. Postini solutions include Email Security, IM Security, Web Security, Message Archiving, Message Encryption, and Policy-enforced TLS.

Itching to make Windows Vista behave the way you want it to, not the way Microsoft does? Take these fun and useful hacks for a whirl.

You've run Windows Vista, you've played around with the Aero interface, and maybe you've even mucked around a little bit in Vista's innards to see what makes it tick.  Now what?

Now is when the fun begins. There are plenty of ways you can hack Windows Vista, make it jump through hoops, bend it to your will and generally make it behave the way you want it to behave, not the way Microsoft does.  Full Article Here!

When a Windows tip becomes popular, it spreads through the community like wildfire. Unfortunately, there's usually only a random relationship between the speed of transmission, the quality of the advice, and its relevance to you.

Case in point: I've seen at least 10 sites this week echo a tip that shows how to use an obscure command-line tool to trim the amount of disk space Windows Vista sets aside for System Restore. But is this good advice? Before you start chopping, make sure you understand the facts and the alternatives.

The stated reason for making this tweak is that, by default, Windows Vista allocates 15% of your hard drive to storing System Restore points and doesn't provide an easy way to shrink that space, as Windows XP does. Lifehacker (a generally excellent site that I read regularly) put it this way:

Full Artilcle:

Comcast Corp. Chief Executive Brian Roberts dazzled a cable industry audience at Las Vegas, showing off for the first time in public new technology that enabled a data download speed of 150 megabits per second, or roughly 25 times faster than today's standard cable modems.

The cost of modems that would support the technology, called "channel bonding," is "not that dissimilar to modems today," he told The Associated Press after a demonstration at The Cable Show. It could be available "within less than a couple years," he said.

The new cable technology is crucial because the industry is competing with a speedy new offering called FiOS, a TV and Internet service that Verizon Communications Inc. is selling over a new fiber-optic network. The top speed currently available through FiOS is 50 megabits per second, but the network is already capable of providing 100 Mbps and the fiber lines offer nearly unlimited potential.

The technology, called DOCSIS 3.0, was developed by the cable industry's research arm, Cable Television Laboratories. Instead of using one TV channel to transmit data, it uses four.

The laboratory said last month it expected manufacturers to begin submitting modems for certification under the standard by the end of the year.

In the presentation, ARRIS Group Inc. chief executive Robert Stanzione downloaded a 30-second, 300-megabyte television commercial in a few seconds and watched it long before a standard modem worked through an estimated download time of 16 minutes.

Stanzione also downloaded the 32-volume Encyclopaedia Britannica 2007 and Merriam-Webster's visual dictionary in under four minutes, when it would have taken a standard modem three hours and 12 minutes.

"If you look at what just happened, 55 million words, 100,000 articles, more than 22,000 pictures, maps and more than 400 video clips," Roberts said. "The same download on dial-up would have taken two weeks."

Other cable industry executives, including Time Warner Inc. Chief Executive Richard Parsons, News Corp. President Peter Chernin and Viacom Inc. Chief Executive Philippe Dauman, cheered the demonstration during a panel afterward.

The Cable Show: http://www.thecableshow.com  Cable Television Laboratories: http://www.cablelabs.com

There are many approaches to doing this for protecting your server though personally the worse thing is to have none when you need one. We have put together a really simple down and dirty approach to backing up IIS 6.0 meta backup below. This approach first creates the backup then renames them to the current date. We run the first bat file daily to assure your system is protected.

@ C:
@cd %systemroot%\system32

@cscript iisback.vbs /backup /b backup

@cd %systemroot%\system32\inetsrv\MetaBack"

ren backup.MD0 %DATE:~4,2%-%DATE:~7,2%-%DATE:~10,4%-backup.MD0
ren backup.SC0 %DATE:~4,2%-%DATE:~7,2%-%DATE:~10,4%-backup.SC0

Then to avoid the folder from filling up and retaining 7 days of backups we just run a second script we only run once a week.

echo on
rem Delete Meta Backup File
FORFILES /p C:\Windows\system32\inetsrv\MetaBack /s /m *.MDO /d -7 /c "CMD /C del /Q @FILE"
FORFILES /p C:\Windows\system32\inetsrv\MetaBack /s /m *.SCO /d -7 /c "CMD /C del /Q @FILE"
rem

Software maker Microsoft Corp. asked search engine operator Yahoo Inc. to re-enter formal negotiations for an acquisition that could be worth $50 billion, the New York Post reported on Friday.

At the time The search and advertising industry could change drastically over the next year if Microsoft has its way with Yahoo. In the last several weeks, it was well publicized that Microsoft and Google went head on in a bidding war for Internet advertising giant DoubleClick. Eventually, Google won and settled with DoubleClick for roughly $3.1 billion -- a sum that had analysts questioning Microsoft's true motives.

of the acquisition, Microsoft had roughly $25 billion of available cash in its bank; more than double that of Google's $11.9 billion. Observing these figures, it was odd to see Microsoft back out of a deal it could easily win. "The best side to be on in a bidding war is the losing side," said legendary Wall Street tycoon Warren Buffet. Buffet is implying that the loser in a bidding war has forced the winner to over-pay for something.

Today, Forbes is reporting that Microsoft is in negotiations with Yahoo for a possible acquisition that could be worth $50 billion. According to the report, Microsoft is feeling greater pressure to compete in the online advertising space. Just recently, Yahoo announced its acquisition of online advertising firm Right Media for $680 million. While this is far from Google's $3.1 billion expense on DoubleClick, it does indicate that Yahoo is already quite a force in online advertising.

Another sticking point for Microsoft is the fact that both Google and Yahoo are ahead of the game when it comes to search. Microsoft has been playing catch up to Google and Yahoo with MSN Search, but having Yahoo under its belt would surely set the company onto a different playing field altogether.

Despite an impending deal with Yahoo, Microsoft hasn’t taken its eyes completely off the Google – DoubleClick deal. Microsoft is loudly voicing its opinion against the deal and has asked regulators to carefully monitor the acquisition.

Cold fusion, the ability to generate nuclear power at room temperatures, has proven to be a highly elusive feat. In fact, it is considered by many experts to be a mere pipe dream -- a potentially unlimited source of clean energy that remains tantalizing,  but so far unattainable.

However, a recently published academic paper from the Navy's Space and Naval Warfare Systems Center (Spawar) in San Diego throws cold water on skeptics of cold fusion. Appearing in the respected journal Naturwissenschaften, which counts Albert Einstein among its distinguished authors, the article claims that Spawar scientists Stanislaw Szpak and Pamela Mosier-Boss have achieved a low energy nuclear reaction (LERN) that can be replicated and verified by the scientific community.

Cold fusion has gotten the cold shoulder from serious nuclear physicists since 1989, when Stanley Pons and Martin Fleischmann were unable to substantiate their sensational claims that deuterium nuclei could be forced to fuse and release excess energy at room temperature. Spawar researchers apparently kept the faith, however, and continued to refine the procedure by experimenting with new fusionable materials.

Szpak and Boss now claim to have succeeded at last by coating a thin wire with palladium and deuterium, then subjected it to magnetic and electric fields. The researchers have offered plastic films called CR-39 detectors as evidence that charged particles have emerging from their reaction experiments.

The Spawar method shows promise, particularly in terms of being easily reproduced and verified by other institutions. Such verification is essential to widespread acceptance of the apparent breakthrough, an important precursor to scientists receiving the necessary funding to fuel additional research in the field.

Around $1.7 billion of unpaid VAT did not appear on a U.K. Revenue and Customs debt case management system because of a failure to transfer data from the main VAT computer system, legislators have been told.

Edward Leigh, chair of the powerful Commons public accounts committee, highlighted a series of problems with major government IT projects in a parliamentary debate on the committee's inquiries

He told MPs: "We found that not all information on VAT debt recorded on the main VAT computer system had been transferred to the so-called trader register.

"That may appear to be an obscure point, but it meant that some $1.7 billion of debt failed to appear on the debt case management system. That is hardly a first-rate example of financial management by a department that should be at the forefront of such matters."

Leigh cited evidence given to the committee earlier this month by Ian Taylor, a past president of the Chartered Institute of Purchasing and Supply who is now director of the center for procurement performance at the Department for Education and Skills.

Taylor had told the PAC "that in his view, public sector people are every bit as skilled as those in the private sector, but the information systems in the public sector are so bad that no private sector firm could afford to put up with them. They would simply go out of business," Leigh said.

The committee chair added: "They do not provide the data that public sector leaders need to manage effectively or to develop robust strategies for delivery."

Leigh also hit back at the government after it attempted to deflect criticism of the NHS's $23.4 billion IT program by claiming that a damning PAC report was based on "out of date" findings by the National Audit Office.

The PAC warned that the NHS scheme was unlikely to deliver significant benefits, unless there was a fundamental change in the rate of progress on the 10-year project. 

The committee chair told MPs he had spoken to Sir John Bourn, head of the NAO, to put a timescale on the auditors' promised -- and unprecedented -- second examination of the project. "Following my encouragement, we are to have another NAO report on the NHS computer in the next year so that we can have an update to check whether all the excellent recommendations of the NAO and the PAC... are being carried out."

Responding to the debate -- which also touched on the IT fiasco at the Rural Payments Agency that is estimated to have cost $940 million -- Treasury minister John Healy gave an indication that the government might reconsider its hardline stance against making public the findings of Office of Government Commerce "gateway reviews" of major IT schemes.

The Social Security numbers of 63,000 people who received Agriculture Department grants have been posted on a government Web site since 1996, but they were taken down last week. Free credit monitoring is being offered to those affected.

The Agriculture data that included Social Security numbers were removed from the Web on April 13 and similar data from 32 other agencies were taken down April 17 as a precaution, said Agriculture spokeswoman Terri Teuber.

A review has determined that none of the other 32 agencies had a similar problem, said Sean Kevelighan, spokesman for the Office of Management and Budget.

"There is no evidence that this information has been misused," Teuber added. "However, due to the potential that this information was downloaded prior to being removed, USDA will provide the additional monitoring service."

The breach was discovered by Marsha Bergmeier, president of Mohr Family Farms in Fairmount, Ill. "I was Googling my farm name at 11 p.m. when I couldn't sleep," she said in a telephone interview, and details of her land loan came up in the second listing of the Google search, a private Web site that reposted the government data.

The next morning, April 13, she contacted the Agriculture Department, her congressman, Rep. Tim Johnson, the private Web site and the Census Bureau and was surprised by how quickly they removed the personal information.

"If somebody downloaded it, it's still out there in the world," she said. "That will never be a private number again."

A federal judge dealt a blow to Vonage Holdings Corp. that sent its stock reeling on Friday, when he agreed to bar the company from using Internet phone call technology patented by Verizon Communications Inc.

Vonage said it was confident its customers would not experience service interruptions, but investors sent its shares down nearly 26 percent.

U.S. District Judge Claude Hilton said he would delay signing the order for two weeks to give Vonage time to try to convince him to stay the injunction while it appeals the entire patent infringement case. "I will sign the injunction at the time I rule on the stay," Hilton said at a hearing.

Hilton agreed with Verizon that it would suffer irreparable harm if he allowed continued infringement of the Voice-over-Internet Protocol (VoIP) technologies that allow consumers to make calls over the Internet.

He rejected arguments by Vonage that the harm to Verizon, the No. 2 U.S. telephone company, was outweighed by other factors, including the public interest.

"I don't think it's going to kill Vonage," said Albert Lin, an analyst at American Technology Research. But he said the legal costs and management distractions were disruptive.

Microsoft Corp. quietly deployed a patch to its Windows Live OneCare security suite earlier than expected to fix a bug that has erased some users' e-mail.

"On Sunday, March 11, the Windows Live OneCare team released a new anti-malware engine that will fix the issue of OneCare erroneously quarantining certain Outlook .pst or Outlook Express .dbx files when infected files were detected within them," a Microsoft representative confirmed today. "Windows Live OneCare customers whose PCs are connected to the Internet will automatically get this fix."

Last week, Microsoft responded to user complaints that their Outlook and Outlook Express mail had vanished by acknowledging the bug and naming today as the patch date. As complaints continued to mount, it released the patch ahead of schedule.

1) Create a text file and name it Backup.sql (or what ever you want).

2) Paste the below script in it:

DECLARE @BackupFile varchar(255), @DB varchar(30), @Description varchar(255), @LogFile varchar(50)
DECLARE @Name varchar(30), @MediaName varchar(30), @BackupDirectory nvarchar(200)
SET @BackupDirectory = 'E:\SQLBackup\'
--Add a list of all databases you don't want to backup to this.
DECLARE Database_CURSOR CURSOR FOR SELECT name FROM sysdatabases WHERE name <> 'tempdb' AND name <> 'model' AND name <> 'Northwind'
OPEN Database_Cursor
FETCH next FROM Database_CURSOR INTO @DB
WHILE @@fetch_status = 0

    BEGIN
    SET @Name = @DB + '( Daily BACKUP )'
    SET @MediaName = @DB + '_Dump' + CONVERT(varchar, CURRENT_TIMESTAMP , 112)
    SET @BackupFile = @BackupDirectory + + @DB + '_' + 'Full' + '_' +
    CONVERT(varchar, CURRENT_TIMESTAMP , 112) + '.bak'
    SET @Description = 'Normal' + ' BACKUP at ' + CONVERT(varchar, CURRENT_TIMESTAMP) + '.'

    IF (SELECT COUNT(*) FROM msdb.dbo.backupset WHERE database_name = @DB) > 0 OR @DB = 'master'
    BEGIN
    SET @BackupFile = @BackupDirectory + @DB + '_' + 'Full' + '_' +
    CONVERT(varchar, CURRENT_TIMESTAMP , 112) + '.bak'
    --SET some more pretty stuff for sql server.
    SET @Description = 'Full' + ' BACKUP at ' + CONVERT(varchar, CURRENT_TIMESTAMP) + '.'
    END
    ELSE
    BEGIN
    SET @BackupFile = @BackupDirectory + @DB + '_' + 'Full' + '_' +
    CONVERT(varchar, CURRENT_TIMESTAMP , 112) + '.bak'
    --SET some more pretty stuff for sql server.
    SET @Description = 'Full' + ' BACKUP at ' + CONVERT(varchar, CURRENT_TIMESTAMP) + '.'
    END
    BACKUP DATABASE @DB TO DISK = @BackupFile
    WITH NAME = @Name, DESCRIPTION = @Description ,
    MEDIANAME = @MediaName, MEDIADESCRIPTION = @Description ,
    STATS = 10
    FETCH next FROM Database_CURSOR INTO @DB
END
CLOSE Database_Cursor
DEALLOCATE Database_Cursor

Open scheduler and create a new task that calls the below command line:
            sqlcmd -S . -i "E:\Backup.sql"

Clean up Old Backup Files.

If you are running Windows Server 2003 you can also run a command utility to delete any files older then x number of days. This helps keep it cleaned up. Just paste this in a batch file and schedule the batch file.

echo on

rem First Delete old SQL Backup Files

FORFILES /p E:\SQLBackup /s /m *.* /d -3 /c "CMD /C del /Q @FILE"

rem pause

Insulting the country's founder, Mustafa Kemal Ataturk, is a crime in Turkey punishable by prison.

Turk Telekom, the country's largest telecommunications provider, immediately began enforcing the ban Wednesday. Those who tried to access the YouTube site from Turkey encountered the message: "Access to this site has been blocked by a court decision!..."

"We are not in the position of saying that what YouTube did was an insult, that it was right or wrong," the head of Turk Telekom, Paul Doany, told the state-run Anatolia news agency. "A court decision was proposed to us, and we are doing what that court decision says."

A message in both Turkish and English at the bottom of the page said, "Access to http://www.youtube.com site has been suspended in accordance with decision no: 2007/384 dated 06.03.2007 of Istanbul First Criminal Peace Court."

The court — acting on a petition from Turk Telekom — ruled later Wednesday that it would revoke the ban as soon as it ascertained that the offending videos had been removed from YouTube. YouTube is owned by internet search engine giant Google.

In recent days, Turkish media publicized what some called a "virtual war" between Greeks and Turks on YouTube, with both sides posting videos to belittle and berate the other.

The video prompting the ban allegedly said Ataturk and the Turkish people were homosexuals, news reports said. The CNN-Turk Web site featured a link allowing Turks to complain directly to YouTube about the "insult."

On its front page on Wednesday, the newspaper Hurriyet said thousands of people had emailed YouTube and that the Ataturk videos had been removed from the site. "YouTube got the message," the headline said.

12.27.2006 Yahoo's article pointing at the gloom & doom of American broadband.   The U.S. needs to spur greater investment in its broadband network, said Kara Swisher, another Wall Street Journal technology columnist. I am questioning a capitalist based news paper, having a columist writing this. 

The quote that really seemed to have rubbed me is this one. "The government has got to get behind this, like it did with the public highways," Swisher said, referring to the federal government's investment in the interstate highway system beginning in the 1950's".  They have the right to publish whatever they wish though the method which has put America on the forefront of the technology which is home grown will take us into the future with out the government getting envolved.

It seems that while they might be correct with America needing some investment, I am not sure the government is the place to get any of this done. Let's really look at the facts.

I hardly think that the need here should not be compared to the Interstate Highway system. The downside to any government controlling their internet is clear. China who totally controls their users experience is nothing I personally would ralley around.  This type of Federal based logic is running wild in America. I am starting to wonder if there is something in the water. The market and capitalizm have got the internet where it is right now just exactly what is the problem? The only thing the government could do is to help or offer some incentive to installing fiber to every home in america as this is seriously expensive. They did not do well with creating the monopoly called cable. I doubt they could do much better with fiber. If they could build it as a neutral network great, but that would be seem to be mission impossible.

Short for "information technology". Synonymous with MIS or CIS, which is "management/computer information systems." Term used to loosely describe computers and the management of information.

IT professionals are often looked down upon as non-social beings who fix computers all day. IT, in reality, is anything related to using technology to store and analyze information.  "The IT department is full of computer geeks." Urban Dictionary Defined:

Yet it has some how become a catch-all for every idiot who has even slightly more knowledge than the person they represent. I remember this group from the late 90's. Most were webmasters then; and it appears they have little more knowledge today.

Even though I wear many hats and have worked internet servers, and a BGP network for over 10 years there is no way I want to be referred to as a IT guy. Nor do I plan to be a webmaster anytime soon. Inspite of the fact I have developed and manage several web sites. So you got a degree in Informantion Technology, yet it appears from my experience after talking to people daily with support issues who have no concept of the basics.

If you don't know just say you don't know. If you do know please don't try to impress someone with your vast experience. You will likely find that ego's are the root of this problem in the first place.
Tip: Don't start your IT guy conversation with something is wrong with your server to the administrator. Likely you will get negitive results. Perhaps something like: I am having a problem with; "Define the Problem". Will certainly produce better results.

Typically client services and administrators only want to know the facts. Likely they do not have much time for your vast knowledge to be revealed really. Nor will they likely be impressed, since they are doing machine administration everyday.

Tip: Don't be a IT guy and put your corporate mail server on a dynamically assigned IP address. Dynamic DNS is a great service but really can have negitive results for a mail server.
Tip: If you are on a windows DC please make sure the DC dns has had some root servers added. Certainly before you tell someone else there is something wrong with their dns.

Sony BMG Music Entertainment's botched attempt to stop unauthorized music copying has cost the company another $4.25 million.

Two days after reaching settlements worth a combined total of $1.5 million with Texas and California, Sony on Thursday agreed to pay another 40 states the money to end investigations into its use of two copy protection programs: First 4 Internet Ltd.'s XCP (extended copy protection), and MediaMax, written by SunnComm International Inc.

In a statement, Sony said it was pleased with Thursday's settlements. More than 12 million Sony BMG CDs shipped with this software last year, according to a statement from the Massachusetts Attorney General.

Sony's trouble began in late 2005, when a computer science researcher disclosed that XCP used dangerous "rootkit" techniques to cloak itself after installation.

Later, investigators found that even users who declined to install the MediaMax program would have software placed on their computers, and one version of the program created a security issue, the Massachusetts statement said.

Sony has reportedly also reached a tentative settlement with the U.S. Federal Trade Commission in the matter, although nothing relating to that investigation was announced Thursday. Sony settled a class-action lawsuit over the software in May.

As with the California and Texas agreements, residents of the 40 states that settled with Sony are entitled to up to $175 in refunds for damages that may have been caused to their computers. The settlements also limit the ways that Sony can use copy protection software in the future and require that the company notify consumers if it uses this kind of software.

President George W. Bush has signed legislation directing the Environmental Protection Agency to study energy use in data centers.

The bill, passed by the Senate on Dec. 8, authorizes the EPA to analyze the growth of energy consumption at data centers. The issue is a growing concern to companies that operate large groups of servers, storage devices and other computer equipment. Many data center operators find that the cost of electricity and  air conditioning that keeps servers cool rivals the cost of the servers themselves.

The EPA study should help to promote more energy-efficient solutions across the high technology industry, said Steve Kester, manager of the government relations division at Advanced Micro Devices Inc. (AMD), a maker of server processors and one of several high technology companies endorsing the bill.

"We're very pleased that the administration sees this as important," Kester said. The EPA study is expected to take about six months and could result in the agency's establishing measurements to judge the energy efficiency of servers, processors and other data center equipment.

AMD hosted a forum Dec. 6 at its headquarters in Sunnyvale, Calif., with the U.S. Department of Energy  and representatives of major technology companies, including Dell Inc., Hewlett-Packard Co., IBM, Sun Microsystems Inc. and Intel Corp. The DOE's Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy called the gathering a "tech industry working group" to exchange ideas on energy conservation.

Google overtook Yahoo as the second most popular Internet destination for Web surfers worldwide in November, while Microsoft held on to the top spot, industry tracker ComScore reported.

Slightly more than 736 million people around the world traveled the Internet last month, with 475.5 million of them visiting Google websites and 475.2 million going to Yahoo online properties, according to ComScore.

Websites of Redmond, Washington-based software giant Microsoft were visited by 501.7 million people, the rating tally revealed.

Hot video-sharing website YouTube placed 10th in the ComScore Media Metrix rankings but showed the largest surge in visitors, with the number catapulting by more than 2,000 percent to 107.9 million.

Google's results did not include visits to YouTube, which it bought in October.

The popularity of Google websites was up nine percent from the same month a year earlier, while visits to Silicon Valley rival Yahoo grew by five percent and to Microsoft by three percent in the same comparison.

Online auction pioneer eBay was ranked in fourth place, with the number of visitors slipping by one percent from November 2005 to 250.8 million. Time Warner Network site visits also notched down one percent, totaling 222.1 million.

The feature that protects against fraudulent Web sites, new in IE 7, in some cases could bog down computers running Windows, according to an article on Microsoft's support site published Tuesday. This could happen when a Web page contains many frames or when a user browses many frames in a short time, the company said.

"When you use Windows Internet Explorer 7 to visit a Web page, the computer may respond very slowly as the Phishing Filter evaluates Web page contents," according to Microsoft. "Internet Explorer 7 evaluates the whole Web page when you browse a frame. Therefore, CPU (central processing unit) usage may be very high."